Vertaling van "for reform's immigration pamphlet than to foster anti-immigration sentiment " (Engels → Frans) :

Who is being inflammatory: the Reform Party for suggesting that Canada continue to be the leading immigrant-accepting nation on earth, or the minister for suggesting that we are anti-immigrant or that we have an anti-immigrant bias? The answer is more than clear.
Par ailleurs, le Parti réformiste estime que le Canada devrait accepter environ 150 000 immigrants par année.

I see no other purpose for Reform's immigration pamphlet than to foster anti-immigration sentiment in the country.
Selon moi, le document réformiste sur l'immigration ne sert à rien d'autre qu'à favoriser un sentiment anti-immigration au Canada.