I think there is a perception that because it is a device, you can see it and feel it and it is real in three dimensions, that somehow that gets treated differently in the evaluation process than a drug, but the potential for them to be dangerous you could say it is equal.
On s'imagine, je crois, que, comme c'est un dispositif que l'on peut voir et toucher, le processus d'évaluation diffère de celui d'un médicament; cependant, leur potentiel de danger est le même.