At the centre of this controversy is none other than Public Works and Government Services Canada; yet who is responsible and accountable, in Bill C-2's mangled lingo, for such events that feature ballooning expenses and questionable activities?
Au centre de la controverse figure nul autre que Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada; pourtant, qui est responsable et imputable, selon le jargon obscur du projet de loi C-2, de telles activités douteuses marquées par des dépenses exorbitantes?