Vertaling van "alleged violation became " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

alleged violation [ alleged contravention | alleged breach ]
prétendue violation [ violation alléguée | violation présumée ]

alleged violation
allégation d'infraction

alleged violation
violation alléguée

allegation of human rights violations
allégation de violations des droits de l'homme

Special Working Group of Experts to investigate Allegations concerning Israel's Violations of the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949 relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War in the Territories Occupied by Israel as a result of Hostil
Groupe de travail spécial d'experts chargé d'enquêter sur les allégations concernant des violations par Israël de la Convention de Genève du 12 août 1949 relative à la protection des personnes civiles temps de guerre, dans les territoires occupés par Isra

National Commission of Inquiry to Investigate Alleged Human Rights Violations and Breaches of International Humanitarian Law in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) between 1996 and 1997
Commission nationale chargée d'enquêter sur les violations des droits de l'homme et les atteintes au droit international humanitaire en République démocratique du Congo (ex-Zaïre) entre 1996 et 1997

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

22.26 A document appearing to have been issued by the Minister and certifying the day on which the acts or omissions that constitute the alleged violation became known to an inspector is admissible in evidence without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed it and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is proof that the inspector became aware of the acts or omissions on that day.
22.26 Tout document paraissant établi par le ministre et attestant la date où les faits reprochés sont parvenus à la connaissance d’un inspecteur est admissible en preuve et fait foi de cette date, sauf preuve contraire, sans qu’il soit nécessaire de prouver l’authenticité de la signature qui y est apposée ni la qualité officielle du signataire.

39.24 A document appearing to have been issued by the Minister and certifying the day on which the acts or omissions that constitute the alleged violation became known to a designated person is admissible in evidence without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed it and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is proof that the designated person became aware of the acts or omissions on that day.
39.24 Tout document paraissant établi par le ministre et attestant la date où les faits reprochés sont parvenus à la connaissance d’une personne désignée est admissible en preuve et fait foi de cette date, sauf preuve contraire, sans qu’il soit nécessaire de prouver l’authenticité de la signature qui y est apposée ni la qualité officielle du signataire.

29.27 A document appearing to have been issued by the Minister and certifying the day on which the acts or omissions that constitute the alleged violation became known to an inspector is admissible in evidence without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed it and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is proof that the inspector became aware of the acts or omissions on that day.
29.27 Tout document paraissant établi par le ministre et attestant la date où les faits reprochés sont parvenus à la connaissance d’un inspecteur est admissible en preuve et fait foi de cette date, sauf preuve contraire, sans qu’il soit nécessaire de prouver l’authenticité de la signature qui y est apposée ni la qualité officielle du signataire.

70. A document appearing to have been issued by the Minister, certifying the day on which the acts or omissions that constitute the alleged offence or violation became known to the Minister, is admissible in evidence without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed the document and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is proof that the Minister became aware of the acts or omissions on that day.
70. Tout document paraissant établi par le ministre et attestant la date où les faits reprochés sont parvenus à sa connaissance fait foi de cette date, sauf preuve contraire, sans qu’il soit nécessaire de prouver l’authenticité de la signature qui y est apposée ni la qualité officielle du signataire.