I mention that because while many of the provisions in this bill that affect the issues of the environment are directed at streamlining, there appears to be a good deal of chance that this kind of gap — for example, the moderate livelihood issue — could become the basis for protracted legal action, which could actually delay the process in another way.
Je le signale parce que, bien que bon nombre de dispositions du projet de loi qui touchent les questions de l'environnement visent à simplifier le processus, il y a apparemment de bonnes chances que des lacunes de ce genre — par exemple, la question de la subsistance convenable — soient utilisées pour déclencher de longues poursuites, qui pourraient retarder le processus d'une autre manière.