If you were to go back and review the hearings, you would understand that the CRTC has made it eminently clear that it has found the absence of input by the public to be a negative value, not a positive value, and that it looks forward with great interest to the movement forward of this amendment.
Si vous examinez les délibérations du comité, vous comprendrez que le CRTC a indiqué clairement que, selon lui, l'absence de participation du public constitue un aspect négatif et non un aspect positif, et qu'il attend avec impatience et beaucoup d'intérêt que l'on donne suite à cette modification.