In other words, if we were able to grant a right to a group by constitutional change, which everyone seemed to think was the right thing to do, it seems to me that the opposite end of that would mean that you could also take away a right from a group.
Autrement dit, si l'on peut modifier la Constitution pour accorder un droit à un groupe - ce qui semble être la chose à faire, de l'avis de tous - il me semble qu'on peut aussi, à l'inverse, modifier la Constitution pour priver un groupe d'un droit.