Traduction de «judgment would preclude » (Anglais → Français) :

TERMINOLOGIE

changed facts judgment by a second court,in order to vary that of the first court,would have to be based on changed facts
un fait nouveau

the rules of private international law of the State in which recognition is sought court which gave the original judgment applied a law other than that which would have been applicable under the rules of private international law of the State in which recognition is sought
les règles du droit international privé de l'Etat requis

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

Are there any other conflicts of interest that in your judgment would preclude certain potential candidates?
D'après vous, existe-il d'autres conflits d'intérêt qui pourraient exclure certains candidats?

As I read this provision, that would preclude us from making that judgment and would simply require us to address each of these substances.
D'après moi, cette disposition nous empêcherait de prendre une telle décision et exigerait simplement que nous nous penchions sur chacune de ces substances.

The Advocate General concludes that Community law precludes a national administration from declining to uphold a claim based on Community law, as interpreted by the Court in a preliminary ruling, on the sole ground that to uphold that claim would run counter to a national rule concerning observance of the finality of judgments.
L'avocat général en conclut que le droit communautaire s'oppose à ce qu'une administration nationale refuse de faire droit à une demande fondée sur le droit communautaire, tel qu'interprété par la Cour dans un arrêt préjudiciel, au seul motif que la prise en compte de cette demande serait contraire à une règle nationale tenant au respect de l'autorité de la chose définitivement jugée.

2. Community law does not preclude the adoption by a Member State, following judgments of the Court declaring duties or charges to be contrary to Community law, of provisions which render the conditions for repayment applicable to those duties and charges less favourable than those which would otherwise have been applied, provided that the duties and charges in question are not specifically targeted by that amendment and the new provisions do not make it impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the right to repayment.
2) Le droit communautaire ne s'oppose pas à ce que, à la suite d'arrêts de la Cour déclarant des droits ou des taxes contraires au droit communautaire, un État membre adopte des dispositions qui rendent les conditions de remboursement applicables à ces droits et taxes moins favorables que celles qui se seraient appliquées en leur absence, pour autant que les droits et taxes en cause ne soient pas spécifiquement visés par cette modification et que les dispositions nouvelles ne rendent pas impossible ou excessivement difficile l'exercice du droit au remboursement.

By its third question, the national court asks whether Community law precludes the adoption by a Member State, following judgments of the Court declaring duties or charges to be contrary to Community law, of provisions which render the conditions for repayment of those duties and charges less favourable than those which would otherwise have been applied.
Par sa troisième question, le juge national demande si le droit communautaire s'oppose à ce que, à la suite d'arrêts de la Cour déclarant des droits ou des taxes contraires au droit communautaire, un État membre adopte des dispositions qui rendent les conditions de remboursement de ces droits et taxes moins favorables que celles qui se seraient appliquées en leur absence.

Even though they are not explicitly cited, the fundamental right to a fair trial with all the appropriate guarantees should be understood to include rights relating to the presumption of innocence, protection with regard to confessions, the provision of evidence relevant to the defence, the right to appeal as prescribed by law, the right to use an interpreter, etc. The prime objective of the right of access to justice is to arrive at a resolution of claims which is founded in law and declared by a judicial body and to execute the judgment, except where such action is precluded on grounds defined by law because it would impinge on that objective, which demands the interpretation which is most likely to safeguard the exercise of the fundamental right.
La finalité ultime du droit d'accès à la justice consiste par-dessus tout, pour l'organe juridictionnel, dans la formation d'une décision fondée en droit, eu égard aux prétentions invoquées devant lui, et dans l'exécution du jugement, sauf si un obstacle juridique quelconque s'y oppose, l'interprétation la plus susceptible d'assurer l'effectivité du droit fondamental étant alors de mise.