As a result, people ought perhaps in future to refrain from stating that if the necessity for Quebec to obtain a veto is central to the whole constitutional debate, is not as a result of René Lévesque's being so careless that it was lost, but has never existed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Et la Cour suprême a dit, après avoir analysé la Constitution: «Tout ce qui existe en matière d'éléments qui peuvent me permettre de retracer l'existence d'un droit de veto, je conclus que le Québec n'a pas de droit de veto et n'en a jamais eu».
