Traduction de «new copyright bill » (Anglais → Français) :

TERMINOLOGIE

Bill C-220: An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Copyright Act (profit from authorship respecting a crime)
Projet de loi C-220 : Loi modifiant le Code criminel et la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (fruits d'une œuvre liée à la perpétration d'un acte criminel)

Legislative Committee on Bill S-17, An Act to amend the Copyright Act, the Industrial Design Act, the Integrated Circuit Topography Act, the Patent Act, the Trade-marks Act and other Acts in consequence thereof [ Legislative Committee on Bill S-17 ]
Comité législatif sur le projet de loi S-17, Loi modifiant la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, la Loi sur les dessins industriels, la Loi sur les topographies de circuits intégrés, la Loi sur les brevets, la Loi sur les marques de commerce et d'autres lois en c [ Comité législatif sur le projet de loi S-17 ]

Committee of Governmental Experts to examine the copyright and neighbouring rights implications of new technologies in respect of dramatic, choreographic and musical works
Comité d'experts gouvernementaux chargé d'examiner les implications des nouvelles technologies sur le plan du droit d'auteur et des droits voisins à l'égard des œuvres dramatiques, chorégraphiques et musicales

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

The new copyright bill, Bill C-11, is a carbon copy of the old copyright bill, Bill C-32.
Le nouveau projet de loi sur le droit d'auteur, le projet de loi C-11, est une copier-coller de l'ancien projet de loi sur le droit d'auteur, le C-32.

Canadian Consumer Initiative, “Consumers’ Gains in Copyright Bill Can be Taken Away by Media Companies: La Loi sur le droit d’auteur,” News release, Ottawa, 4 June 2010; The Retail Council of Canada, “Retail Council of Canada welcomes introduction of Copyright Modernization Act: Industry commends Government for rejecting calls to extend blank media levy,” News release, Ottawa, 3 June 2010; Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, “AUCC welcomes new copyright bill,” News release, Ottawa, 3 June 2010; Canadian Association of University Teachers, “Copyright bill restricts user rights, research and innovation,” News release, Ottawa, 2 June 2010; Canadian Library Association, “Canadian Library Association Gives Passing Grade to New Copyright Legislation: User Rights Still Tempered by Digital Locks,” News release, Ottawa, 3 June 2010; and Canadian Museums Association, “New Copyright Legislation: A Good Step Forward,” News release, 3 June 2010.
Initiative canadienne des consommateurs, Les consommateurs seront perdants à cause des cadenas numériques, communiqué, Montréal et Ottawa, 4 juin 2010; Conseil canadien du commerce de détail, Retail Council of Canada welcomes introduction of Copyright Modernization Act: Industry commends Government for rejecting calls to extend blank media levy, communiqué, Ottawa, 3 juin 2010; Association des universités et collèges du Canada, L’AUCC accueille favorablement la nouvelle Loi sur le droit d’auteur, communiqué, Ottawa, 3 juin 2010; Association canadienne des professeures et professeurs d’université, Le projet de loi sur les droits d’auteur restreint les droits d’utilisation à des fins de recherche et d’innovation, communiqué, Ottawa, 2 juin 2010; Association canadienne des bibliothèques, Canadian Library Association Gives Passing Grade to New Copyright Legislation: User Rights Still Tempered by Digital Locks, communiqué, Ottawa, 3 juin 2010; Association des musées canadiens, Loi sur la modernisation du droit d’auteur : un bon pas en avant, communiqué, 3 juin 2010.

Sophie Milman, “New copyright law would cut artists’ earnings: Digital devices exempt from copying fee levied on blank cassettes and CDs,” The Toronto Star, 9 June 2010; Alliance of Cinema, Television and Recording Artists [ACTRA], “Canada’s New Copyright Bill A Blow To Artists: ‘Half the Bill is missing,’“ News release, Toronto, 2 June 2010; Canadian Music Creators Coalition, “CMCC: Time to Invest in Supporting Artists Instead of Focusing on Punishing Fans,” 8 June 2010; Access Copyright, “Access Copyright Is Deeply Concerned” (2010); Canadian Private Copying Collective, “Proposed Copyright Law Fails Canadian Artists” (2010).
Sophie Milman, « New copyright law would cut artists’ earnings: Digital devices exempt from copying fee levied on blank cassettes and CDs », The Toronto Star, 9 juin 2010; Alliance of Cinema, Television and Recording Artists [ACTRA], Canada’s New Copyright Bill A Blow To Artists: ‘Half the Bill is missing’, communiqué, Toronto, 2 juin 2010; Alliance canadienne des créateurs de musique, CMCC: Time to Invest in Supporting Artists Instead of Focusing on Punishing Fans, 8 juin 2010; Access Copyright, Access Copyright Is Deeply Concerned (2010); SCPCP, Le projet de loi sur le droit d’auteur ne tient pas compte des artistes canadiens (2010).

Sophie Milman, “New copyright law would cut artists’ earnings: Digital devices exempt from copying fee levied on blank cassettes and CDs,” The Toronto Star, 9 June 2010; Alliance of Cinema, Television and Recording Artists [ACTRA], “Canada’s New Copyright Bill A Blow To Artists: ‘Half the Bill is missing,’” News release, Toronto, 2 June 2010; Canadian Music Creators Coalition, “CMCC: Time to Invest in Supporting Artists Instead of Focusing on Punishing Fans,” 8 June 2010; Access Copyright, “Access Copyright Is Deeply Concerned by the Government’s Lack of Support for the Remuneration of Creators Through Collective Licensing,” News release, Toronto, 3 June 2010.; Canadian Private Copying Collective, “Proposed Copyright Law Fails Canadian Artists: Survey shows Canadians support fair compensation to artists and extending the levy to MP3 players (78 Kb, 2 pages),” News release, Toronto, 2 June 2010.
Sophie Milman, « New copyright law would cut artists’ earnings: Digital devices exempt from copying fee levied on blank cassettes and CDs », The Toronto Star, 9 juin 2010; Alliance of Cinema, Television and Recording Artists [ACTRA], Canada’s New Copyright Bill A Blow To Artists: ‘Half the Bill is missing’, communiqué, Toronto, 2 juin 2010; Alliance canadienne des créateurs de musique, CMCC: Time to Invest in Supporting Artists Instead of Focusing on Punishing Fans, 8 juin 2010; Access Copyright, Access Copyright Is Deeply Concerned by the Government’s Lack of Support for the Remuneration of Creators Through Collective Licensing, communiqué, Toronto, 3 juin 2010; SCPCP, Le projet de loi sur le droit d’auteur ne tient pas compte des artistes canadiens (79 ko, 2 pages), communiqué, Toronto, 2 juin 2010.