So why was provision not made for longer periods of unemployment insurance, for manpower training to be turned over to the provinces, which, if they had had increased resources, would have been able to offer longer training periods that were more adapted to needs?
Donc, pourquoi ne pas avoir prévu, par exemple, des périodes d'assurance-chômage plus longues, avoir cédé la formation de la main-d'oeuvre à des provinces qui, elles, avec davantage de moyens, auraient pu offrir des programmes de formation plus longs, plus adaptés?