Vertaling van "partnership programme detailing " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

Partnership programme
partnership programme

Individual Partnership Programme | IPP [Abbr.]
Programme de partenariat individuel

Individual Partnership Programme | IPP [Abbr.]
programme de partenariat individuel

Small Vessel Partnership Initiative [ Small Vessel Partnerships Programme ]
Programme Partenariats relatifs aux petits bâtiments

Programme Execution Plan [ PEP | Programme Activity Details ]
Plan d'exécution du Programme [ PEP | Détails des activités du programme ]

ESA/Industry Telecommunications Partnership Programme
Programme de télécommunications ASE/Industrie en partenariat

Individual Partnership Programme (IPP)
Programme de partenariat individuel (PPI)

Partnership Work Programme [ PWP ]
programme de travail du Partenariat

individual partnership programme [ IPP ]
programme de partenariat individuel

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

There is a growing interest in Member States in the role of territorially-based, integrated strategies, and in partnerships as instruments of active labour market policy; strategic partnerships at the local level are often mentioned, but are rarely described in detail, and often the partnerships mentioned are linked with Structural Funds programmes.
Les États membres accordent un intérêt croissant au rôle des stratégies intégrées territoriales, et aux partenariats en tant qu'instruments de politique active du marché du travail. Les partenariats stratégiques au niveau local sont souvent évoqués, mais rarement décrits en détail. Les partenariats mentionnés sont souvent liés à des programmes relevant des fonds structurels.

The Commission also issued a European Code of Conduct on Partnership[10], which covers all the ESI Funds, and provides detailed criteria for organising partnerships, for planning, implementing, and following up the programmes.
La Commission a également publié un code de conduite européen en matière de partenariat[10] couvrant l’ensemble des Fonds structurels et d’investissement européens et fournissant des critères détaillés pour l’organisation de partenariats et la planification, la mise en œuvre et le suivi des programmes.

Striking the right balance between the need for transparency and accountability of programmes (which requires more detailed information and monitoring mechanisms), for flexibility within programmes, and for the partnership with the Commission to be transformed into a more strategic exercise rather than one of micro management, remains a difficult challenge for cohesion policy.
Le juste équilibre à trouver entre le besoin de transparence et de responsabilité en ce qui concerne les programmes (ce qui exige des mécanismes d'information et de suivi plus détaillés), la quête de souplesse au sein des programmes et la nécessité de transformer le partenariat avec la Commission en un exercice de caractère plus stratégique et plutôt qu'en un exercice de micro management, reste un défi difficile à relever pour la politique de cohésion.

As a rule, programmes are no more than 25 pages long and contain the following: a description of the region, identifying its strengths and weaknesses.the objectives to be attained and the strategy to promote innovation.the types of operation to be funded (studies, pilot projects, participation in networks, technical assistance, etc.) and the timetable for implementation.theirimpact on the ground.the groups targeted by the operations.the implementation structures (managing body, paying body, steering committee); a description of the control, monitoring and evaluation systemsthe financing plan detailing the public and private contributions; a description of the partnership set up (parties involved and consultation procedure).information and publicity activities to promote the programme, targeting final beneficiaries and the general public.
N'excédant pas en principe 25 pages, les programmes régionaux contiennent les éléments suivants: une description de la région identifiant ses forces et ses faiblesses ; les objectifs à atteindre et la stratégie de promotion de l'innovation.les actions à financer (exemples: études, projets pilotes, participation aux réseaux, assistance technique) ainsi que le calendrier de mise en œuvre.leur impact sur le terrain.les groupes cibles bénéficiaires des actions.les structures de mise en œuvre (autorité de gestion et de paiement, comité de pilotage).la description des méthodes de contrôle, de suivi et d'évaluationle plan de financement détaillant le soutien financier public et privé; une description du partenariat mis en place (acteurs et processus de consultation) ; les actions d'information et de publicité du programme en faveur des bénéficiaires finaux et du grand public.

Member States receiving new recommendations under the Excessive Deficit Procedure must submit Economic Partnership Programmes, which include details of fiscal and structural reforms they intend to carry out (for example, on pension systems, taxation or public healthcare) to correct their deficits in a lasting way.
Les États membres recevant de nouvelles recommandations relevant de la procédure concernant les déficits excessifs doivent soumettre un programme de partenariat économique indiquant, de manière détaillée, les réformes budgétaires et structurelles qu'ils entendent entreprendre (visant par exemple les systèmes de retraite, la fiscalité ou la santé publique) afin de réduire durablement leur déficit.

Member States in the Excessive Deficit Procedure must not only submit budgetary plans, but also Economic Partnership Programmes, which contain detailed fiscal-structural reforms (for example, on pension systems, taxation or public healthcare) that will correct their deficits in a lasting way.
États membres faisant l'objet d'une procédure de déficit excessif: ces pays doivent présenter non seulement des plans budgétaires, mais aussi des programmes de partenariat économique prévoyant des réformes budgétaires structurelles détaillées (visant par exemple les systèmes de retraite, la fiscalité ou la santé publique) propres à réduire durablement leur déficit.

Also, since budgetary measures might be insufficient to ensure a lasting correction of the excessive deficit, Member States whose currency is the euro and are subject to an excessive deficit procedure should present an economic partnership programme detailing the policy measures and structural reforms needed to ensure an effective and lasting correction of the excessive deficit, building on the latest update of their national reform programme and their stability programme.
Par ailleurs, puisque les mesures budgétaires pourraient s'avérer insuffisantes pour corriger durablement le déficit excessif, les États membres dont la monnaie est l'euro et qui font l'objet d'une procédure de déficit excessif devraient présenter un programme de partenariat économique détaillant les mesures et les réformes structurelles nécessaires pour assurer une correction effective et durable du déficit excessif, en s'appuyant sur la version actualisée de leur programme national de réformes et de leur programme de stabilité.

They must undertake not only fiscal consolidation but they must also sign "economic partnership programmes", which contain detailed structural reforms which they intend to put in place to improve competitiveness and boost growth.
Ils doivent non seulement assainir leur budget, mais également souscrire à un «programme de partenariat économique» détaillant les réformes structurelles qu’ils entendent appliquer pour améliorer la compétitivité et stimuler la croissance.

(Return tabled) Question No. 612 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to changes to environmental programs resulting from the announcements in Budget 2012: (a) specifying how each identified cut is projected to impact the government’s access to scientific information required for the development of public policy, the number of people to be cut, and the amount of money to be cut, what are all areas of scientific research and partnerships to be cut, including, but not limited to, (i) air pollution, (ii) emergency preparedness and response, (iii) industrial waste, (iv) water quality; (b) what briefing notes, memos, or any other documentation, including, for each, the details of its findings and recommendations, have been provided to the Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources, Minister of the Environment, their respective Parliamentary Secretaries, their respective Deputy Ministers, and their respective staff members, regarding impacts of research and partnership cuts on the government’s access to scientific information required for the development of public policy; (c) what, in detail, does “sufficient data is available to support the dissemination and validation of the UV Index forecast” mean, (i) what does “we will continue to have enough data for EC to track and report on ozone” mean, (iii) in detail, will the government maintain the integrity of the ozone monitoring program, (iv) in detail, will the government maintain Canadian contributions to the global observing system for climate in support of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), (v) what studies have been undertaken to assess the impact of streamlining ozone monitoring on Canada’s international reputation, and what were any findings and recommendations; (d) what briefing notes, memos, or any other documentation, including, for each, the details of its findings and recommendations, have been provided to the Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources, Minister of the Enviro ...
(Le document est déposé) Question n 612 Mme Kirsty Duncan: En ce qui concerne les changements apportés aux programmes de l’environnement à la suite des annonces faites dans le cadre du Budget de 2012: a) en précisant de quelle manière chaque compression est censée influer sur l’accès du gouvernement à l’information scientifique nécessaire pour élaborer les politiques publiques, le nombre de personnes devant partir, la somme d’argent retirée, quels sont tous les domaines de recherche et de partenariat scientifiques qui seront amputés, y compris, sans s’y limiter, (i) la pollution atmosphérique, (ii) les mesures et l’intervention d’urgence, (iii) les déchets industriels, (iv) la qualité de l’eau; b) quelles notes d’information ou notes de service, ou quelle documentation, et pour chacune d’elles les détails des constatations et des recommandations, ont été fournies au premier ministre, au ministre des Ressources naturelles, au ministre de l’Environnement, à leurs secrétaires parlementaires, à leurs sous-ministres respectifs et à leur personnel respectif, concernant l’impact des compressions dans les partenariats et la recherche sur l’accès du gouvernement à l’information scientifique nécessaire pour élaborer les politiques publiques; c) qu’entend-on, en détail, par « il existe des données suffisantes pour corroborer la diffusion et la validation des prévisions de l’indice UV », (i) que veut dire « nous continuerons d’avoir assez de données pour permettre à EC de faire le suivi de la couche d’ozone et d’en faire rapport », (iii) en détail, est-ce que le gouvernement maintiendra l’intégrité du programme de surveillance de la couche d’ozone, (iv) en détail, est-ce que le gouvernement maintiendra les contributions du Canada au Système mondial d'observation du climat en vertu de la Convention-cadre des Nations Unies sur les changements climatiques (CCNUCC), (v) quelles études ont été entreprises pour évaluer l’impact d’une rationalisation de la surveillance de la couche ...

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...