That being said, how can he justify the fact that the unemployment insurance reform his cabinet, his government, is considering will, according to his own analysis, affect people with incomes of less than $25,000 annually, in other words, workers whose employment status is precarious, who are at the bottom of the wage scale, the neediest in our society, and that these people may be permanently disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits as a result of his cutbacks?
Comment, dans ce contexte, peut-il justifier que le projet de révision de l'assurance-chômage que le Cabinet, son gouvernement, est en train de mettre en place affectera, selon ses propres analyses, des gens dont le revenu est inférieur à 25 000 $ par année, c'est-à-dire les travailleurs à statut précaire, les moins bien rémunérés, les plus vulnérables de notre société?