Following a detailed analysis, it seems that the Board of Auditors and the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) identified certain practices that were subject to criticism, and in particular they criticised a management style which was too personalised, deficiencies in budget programming, poor management of human resources (especially at headquarters) and mediocre implementation of worldwide programmes.
Au terme d'une analyse attentive, il apparaît que le "Board of Auditors" et l'Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) identifient certaines pratiques critiquables, et dénoncent principalement un style de management trop personnalisé, une programmation budgétaire déficiente, une mauvaise gestion des ressources humaines (surtout au siège), et une mise en œuvre médiocre des programmes globaux.