If it's not, I'm sure you're not going to say anything. At any rate, would you agree with my position that if the CRTC has tools at its disposal with respect to foreign ownership that it deems to be effective, and indeed are effective relative to content carriage, the issue of foreign ownership is really neither here nor there?
Quoi qu'il en soit, êtes-vous d'accord avec moi que la question de la propriété étrangère n'a aucun rapport, même si le CRTC dispose d'outils qu'il estime efficaces, et qui le sont effectivement concernant le contenu?