- Secondly, because OLAF is the thief set to catch the policeman, since the European Commission, at the centre of the suspicions of corruption, is in fact, by means of OLAF, going to be supervising the Parliament, whereas it is Parliament which should be doing the supervising rather than being its target.
- Ensuite parce que l’OLAF, c’est le voleur qui contrôle le gendarme puisque la Commission européenne, au centre des soupçons de corruption, va contrôler en fait, via l’OLAF, le Parlement qui devrait être lui le contrôleur et non le contrôlé.