From your point of view, either as individuals or as representatives of your union, is there some profound, philosophical difference between you and your U.S. counterparts that you think would make that difficult, or any differences in approach that would create problems there?
Selon vous, comme personne ou représentant syndical, existe-t-il entre vous et vos homologues américains des différences profondes sur les plans de la philosophie ou de l'approche qui pourraient créer des problèmes?
