My thought is if you use that, perhaps there's a reason why this section shouldn't exist, and I look at that perhaps as a reason why we should consider maintaining the section, because with respect to those types of crimes that are being targeted, if the offence is truly victimless, then I don't see the problem.
Vous dites que l'article ne doit pas exister à cause de cela et je dis qu'au contraire, l'article doit être maintenu justement pour cette raison; si les crimes ne font pas de victime, alors je ne vois pas où est le problème.