So, Mr. Chairman, if the intent of the amendment and I'm not even sure what it is is to leave it open to the flexibility of the committee without prejudice and without any relevance to what is suggested as the motivation, I think we should be as flexible as we possibly can, especially in hearing from the public, because that's the nature of committee work.
Donc, monsieur le président, je n'en suis pas certain mais, si l'intention de l'amendement est d'assurer la souplesse nécessaire sans préjugé ni intention cachée, je pense que nous devrions faire preuve de toute l'ouverture possible, surtout quand il s'agit d'entendre le grand public, parce que c'est la nature de notre travail.