Traduction de «al breast cancer screening » (Français → Néerlandais) :

39. Theberge I, Hebert-Croteau N, Langlois A, Major D, Brisson J. Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program.
40. Theberge I, Hebert-Croteau N, Langlois A, Major D, Brisson J. Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program.

18. Larsson LG, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, Tabar L, et al. Updated overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization.
18. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nystrom L, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.

Table 11: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Crude RR and and RR adjusted following Cuzick (1997) 22 Study ID study
Table 9: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Crude RR and and RR adjusted following Cuzick (1997) 21 Study ID study

Table 10: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)
Table 8: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)

21. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, Forrest AP, Hepburn W, Kirkpatrick AE, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening.
20. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, Forrest AP, Hepburn W, Kirkpatrick AE, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening.

51. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.
52. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Application Presentation: Symposium A web-based Support System for the belgian Breast Cancer Screening Program (.Powerpoint) by Eddy Husson, Informatique Médicale et Biostatistique, Université de Liège (B)
Application Presentation: A web-based Support System for the belgian Breast Cancer Screening Program(.Powerpoint) by Eddy Husson, Informatique Médicale et Biostatistique, Université de Liège (B)

Table 4: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words
Table 2: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words

Les auteurs qui proposent l’utilisation du PET-FDG en screening se basent sur 2 études : une étude japonaise dans laquelle sur 3165 sujets, 36 cancers ont été diagnostiqués (1.14%) et une étude à Taïwan dans laquelle 38 cancers ont été diagnostiqués sur 3631 sujets (1.05%).
De auteurs die het gebruik van FDG-PET voor screening voorstellen, baseren zich op 2 studies: een Japanse studie waarbij 36 kankers werden vastgesteld onder 3165 personen (1.14%) en een studie in Taiwan waarbij 38 kankers werden vastgesteld onder 3631 personen (1.05%).

Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening (mai 2013) (CSS 8901)
Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening (mei 2013) (HGR 8901) (voorlopig enkel in het Engels beschikbaar)