Traduction de «comparative effectiveness » (Français → Néerlandais) :

La seule solution pour ces MG menacés de perdre leur agrément est de leur accorder un statut alternatif équivalent (MG à activité spécifique) qui les distingue des MG qui répondent aux critères et qui permet donc de comparer des profils comparables et d'identifier les budgets (de prestations et de prescriptions) de la médecine générale effective.
De enige oplossing voor de huisartsen die hun erkenning dreigen te verliezen is hen een equivalent alternatief statuut toe te kennen (huisarts met specifieke activiteit), waardoor ze kunnen onderscheiden worden van de huisartsen die aan de criteria beantwoorden. Dit moet toelaten om vergelijkbare profielen te vergelijken en om de budgetten (van de verstrekkingen en de voorschriften) van de werkelijke huisartsgeneeskunde te identificeren.

There was no difference in effect in trials where the dose was tapered or weaned off, compared to those where withdrawal was abrupt.
There may be a small benefit from higher dosed patches than in lower dosed patches.

32. Gemmell H, Miller P. Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review (Provisional abstract).
2008; 33(1):90-4. 31. Miller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review.

Ce qui précède concerne l'homme, priorité pour l'AFSCA. Il faut suivre un raisonnement analogue pour la concentration maximale dans l'environnement (predicted no effect concentration PNEC) et la comparer avec les concentrations environnementales prévues (predicted environmental concentration PEC).
Het voorgaande slaat op de mens, de prioriteit voor het FAVV. Daarnaast dient men een analoge redenering te maken naar de maximaal toegelaten concentratie in het milieu (predicted no effect concentration PNEC) en deze vergelijken met de voorspelde milieuconcentraties (predicted environmental concentration PEC).

In this trial, the effect of Bupropion was not significant compared to placebo (p=0,50).
In this trial, the effect of bupropion was not significant compared to placebo (p=0,50).

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

L’étude SEARCH (Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Hocysteine) a évalué les effets du traitement par simvastatine 80 mg comparé au traitement par 20 mg (suivi moyen de 6,7 ans) sur les événements vasculaires majeurs (tels que maladie coronarienne fatale, infarctus du myocarde non fatal, ou une opération de revascularisation coronaire, accident vasculaire cérébral fatal ou non, opération de revascularisation périphérique) chez 12 064 patients avec antécédent d’infarctus du myocarde.
In de Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH) werd het effect beoordeeld van behandeling met simvastatine 80 mg versus 20 mg (mediane follow-up 6,7 jaar) op ernstige vasculaire voorvallen (major vascular events – MVEs : gedefinieerd als fataal CHZ, niet-fataal MI, coronaire revascularisatie-ingreep, niet-fatale beroerte of perifere revascularisatie-ingreep) bij 12.064 patiënten met een voorschiedenis van myocardinfarct.

L'étude SEARCH (Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine) a évalué les effets du traitement par 80 mg de simvastatine comparé à 20 mg (médiane de suivi de 6,7 ans) sur les événements vasculaires majeurs (tels que maladie coronarienne fatale, infarctus du myocarde non fatal, ou intervention de revascularisation coronaire, accident vasculaire cérébral fatal ou non, intervention de revascularisation périphérique) chez 12 064 patients avec antécédent d'infarctus du myocarde.
In de Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH) werd het effect beoordeeld van behandeling met simvastatine 80 mg versus 20 mg (mediane follow-up 6,7 jaar) op ernstige vasculaire voorvallen (major vascular events – MVEs: gedefinieerd als fataal CHZ, niet-fataal MI, coronaire revascularisatie-ingreep, niet-fatale of fatale beroerte of perifere revascularisatie-ingreep) bij 12.064 patiënten met een voorschiedenis van myocardinfarct.

Chez le chien, une augmentation de l'intervalle QT a été observée ; le NOEL (non observable effect level) correspond aux concentrations 23 fois supérieures à celles trouvées chez les patients (7 ng/ml comparé à 0,3 ng/ml qui est la limite de détection de l'émédastine).
Er werd aangetoond dat emedastine het QT-interval verlengde bij honden. De NOEL (No Observed Effect Level; waarde waarbij geen effect wordt gezien) komt overeen met concentraties die 23 keer hoger waren dan degene die gevonden werden bij patiënten (7 ng/ml in vergelijking met 0,3 ng/ml, d.w.z. de detectielimiet voor emedastine).

Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).
The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 444 is originally developed to Only for breast cancer and colon cancer, the US has higher survival rates assess the care needs of the elderly in institutions, and has later been than Belgium (data shown in documentation sheet in Supplement S1). To extended with instruments for different care settings and subgroups. In be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).