Vertaling van "des numbers needed tot treat " (Frans → Nederlands) :

First and most important, for symptomatic stenosis patients, the number needed to treat to benefit within two years is between 3 to 19, depending on degree of stenosis and age. 15 For asymptomatic stenosis, as the Kaplan Mayer-curve suggests, at least five years of follow-up are needed to recoup the lost life years by increased morbidity and mortality (see further).
First and most important, for symptomatic stenosis patients, the number needed to treat to benefit within two years is between 3 to 19, depending on degree of stenosis and age.15 For asymptomatic stenosis, as the Kaplan Mayer-curve suggests, at least five years of follow-up are needed to recoup the lost life years by increased morbidity and mortality (see further).

En ce qui concerne les fractures vertébrales, une diminution du risque a été démontrée avec l' alendronate, l' acide ibandronique et le risédronate, administrés quotidiennement; chez des femmes ostéoporotiques avec des antécédents de fractures vertébrales (c.-à-d. les femmes avec le risque de fracture le plus élevé), des Numbers Needed tot Treat (NNT’s) de 16 à 20 ont été retrouvés dans des études d' une durée de 3 ans; cela signifie que 16 à 20 femmes devaient être traitées pendant 3 ans pour prévenir une fracture vertébrale chez une femme.
Voor wervelfracturen is met alendronaat, ibandroninezuur en risedronaat, dagelijks toegediend, een daling van het risico aangetoond; bij vrouwen met osteoporose en antecedenten van wervelfractuur (dus vrouwen met het hoogste fractuurrisico) worden in studies over een periode van 3 jaar Numbers Needed tot Treat(NNT’s) gevonden van 16 à 20, d.w.z. dat 16 à 20 vrouwen gedurende drie jaar moesten behandeld worden om bij één vrouw een wervelfractuur te voorkómen.

Les résultats présentés et le nombre de sujets à traiter (number needed to treat - NNT) se rapportent uniquement à des populations ayant une motivation comparable.
De voorgelegde resultaten en het daaruit berekende " number needed to treat" (NNT – te behandelen aantal mensen om 1 extra roker te doen stoppen) hebben alleen betrekking op mensen met een vergelijkbare motivatie.

Cela correspond à un Number Needed to Treat (NNT) de 14 [intervalle de confiance à 95%: 8,7 à 33,9], ce qui signifie que 14 patients devaient être traités pendant 3 ans par la metformine pour prévenir un cas de diabète.
Dit komt overeen met een Number Needed to Treat (NNT) van 14 [95%-betrouwbaarheidsinterval: 8,7 tot 33,9], wat betekent dat 14 patiënten gedurende 3 jaar moesten worden behandeld met metformine om één geval van diabetes te voorkómen.

Le NNT (Number Needed to Treat) était de 13: 13 enfants devaient être traités de manière prophylactique pour éviter 1 cas supplémentaire de grippe symptomatique par rapport au placebo.
De NNT (Number Needed to Treat) bedroeg 13: 13 kinderen moesten profylactisch worden behandeld om t.o.v. placebo bij één bijkomend kind symptomatische influenza te voorkómen.

Le " nombre de sujets à traiter" (Ânumber needed to treatÊ) augmente rapidement en l'absence de symptômes et dans les sténoses moins graves, et peut rapidement se transformer en " number needed to harm" (nombre de personnes traitées présentant un effet négatif) en raison des risques liés à de l'opération.
Het " number needed to treat" loopt snel op bij afwezigheid van symptomen en minder enstige stenoses, en kan snel omslaan in een " number needed to harm" door de intrinsieke operatierisico's.

Number Needed to Screen = 1008 avec un intervalle de crédibilité à
tot 20 jaar [NNS : numbers needed to screen = 1008 (95% betrouwbaarheidsintervallen,

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

139 It implies that community services should be which evaluates the number of full-time equivalents (FTE) of active offered whenever possible, while hospital servicess should be available physicians. For the first time, preliminary counts of the number of when ambulatory care cannot provide a good answer to the patient’s practising nurses by sector of activity are now available. needs.
139 It implies that community services should be physicians. For the first time, preliminary counts of the number of offered whenever possible, while hospital servicess should be available practising nurses by sector of activity are now available. when ambulatory care cannot provide a good answer to the patient’s needs.

In this case the intent-to-treat analysis can give unrealistically narrow confidence intervals if substantial numbers of patients elect to have the treatment they were not randomized to receive 22 .
In this case the intent-to-treat analysis can give unrealistically narrow confidence intervals if substantial numbers of patients elect to have the treatment they were not randomized to receive 21 .