Traduction de «distinguish the effect of » (Français → Néerlandais) :

Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).
The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 444 is originally developed to Only for breast cancer and colon cancer, the US has higher survival rates assess the care needs of the elderly in institutions, and has later been than Belgium (data shown in documentation sheet in Supplement S1). To extended with instruments for different care settings and subgroups. In be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).

7. Annexe23 7.1 Comprendre le « Distinguished Name » (DN) de votre certificat .23
7. Bijlage.23 7.1 De “Distinguished Name” (DN) van uw certificaat begrijpen .23

7.1 Comprendre le « Distinguished Name » (DN) de votre certificat
7.1 De “Distinguished Name” (DN) van uw certificaat begrijpen

Le certificat eHealth contient, parmi d’autres informations comme votre clé publique, 7 valeurs qui identifient le propriétaire comme «Distinguished Name».
Het eHealth-certificaat bevat naast andere informatie zoals uw publieke sleutel 7 waarden die de eigenaar identificeren als “Distinguished name”.

Table 5: Update of evidence found in SR and HTA Search Radiation harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Update of HTA (ETMIS) Date 03/05/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms, mammography/ adverse effects, mass screening/ adverse effects Medline Case report.tw (156081) (OVID): 2 Letter.pt (689184) Filter 3 Historical article.pt (263481) RCT 4 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 5 Review,multicase.pt (0) 6 or/1-5 (1099551) 7 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30731) 8 Neoplasms/ (216844) 9 7 and 8 (536) 10 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171800) 11 (breast$ adj5 neoplas$).tw (2557) 12 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135752) 13 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31777) 14 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23441) 15 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16582) 16 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 17 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8472) 18 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 (207367) 19 Mammography/ae [Adverse Effects] (517) 20 Mass Screening/ae [Adverse Effects] (325) 21 19 or 20 (763) 22 18 and 21 (443) 23 22 not 6 (379) 24 limit 23 to (yr=" 2005 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (44) 25 from 24 keep 1-44 (44)
Table 3: Update of evidence found in SR and HTA Search Radiation harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Update of HTA (ETMIS) Date 03/05/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms, mammography/ adverse effects, mass screening/ adverse effects Medline Case report.tw (156081) (OVID): 2 Letter.pt (689184) Filter 3 Historical article.pt (263481) RCT 4 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 5 Review,multicase.pt (0) 6 or/1-5 (1099551) 7 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30731) 8 Neoplasms/ (216844) 9 7 and 8 (536) 10 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171800) 11 (breast$ adj5 neoplas$).tw (2557) 12 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135752) 13 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31777) 14 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23441) 15 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16582) 16 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 17 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8472) 18 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 (207367) 19 Mammography/ae [Adverse Effects] (517) 20 Mass Screening/ae [Adverse Effects] (325) 21 19 or 20 (763) 22 18 and 21 (443) 23 22 not 6 (379) 24 limit 23 to (yr=" 2005 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (44) 25 from 24 keep 1-44 (44)

36. Woolacott NF, Jones L, Forbes CA, Mather LC, Sowden AJ, Song FJ et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
36. Woolacott NF, Jones L, Forbes CA, Mather LC, Sowden AJ, Song FJ et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Van Den Bruel A, Cleemput I, Van Linden A, Schoefs D, Ramaekers D, Bonneux L. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation strategies.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation strategies.

randomized trials.1 Effective strategies for the secondary prevention of stroke include treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, and antiplatelet therapy (Evidence level 1). 1 Statins are effective in the prevention of stroke, although evidence remains limited to heart disease patients (Evidence level 1). 2, 3
treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, and antiplatelet therapy (Evidence level 1).1 Statins are effective in the prevention of stroke, although evidence remains limited to heart disease patients (Evidence level 1).2, 3

„They are designed to help practitioners assimilate, evaluate and implement the everincreasing amount of evidence and opinion on best current practice. Clinical guidelines are intended as neither cookbook nor textbook but, where there is evidence of variation in practice which affects patient outcomes and a strong research base providing evidence of effective practice, guidelines can assist doctors and other health care professionals in making decisions about appropriate and effective care for their patients.
variation in practice which affects patient outcomes and a strong research base providing evidence of effective practice, guidelines can assist doctors and other health care professionals in making decisions about appropriate and effective care for their patients.

Conformément aux standards du NICE, les résultats ont été relativement défavorables et " le Comité a conclu que l'ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio – ratio cout efficacité incrémental) le plus plausible du bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus du paclitaxel toutes les semaines se situait entre £110,000 et £259,000 par QALY gagné”.
Volgens de NICE normen waren de resultaten relatief ongunstig en " de Commissie besloot dat de meest plausibele ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio - incrementele kosteneffectiviteitsratio) voor bevacizumab in combinatie met paclitaxel ten opzichte van wekelijkse paclitaxel tussen £110,000 en £259,000 per gewonnen QALY schommelde" .