Traduction de «not reduce mortality in patients with no » (Français → Néerlandais) :

Maron DJ. Review: statins do not reduce mortality in patients with no history of cardiovascular disease.
Bespreking van: Ray KK, Seshasai SRK, Erqou S et al. Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention.

Source Statement ACA Not included ACP Not included ASA Selected patients : Agreement : 90 % of consultants, 92 % ASA Members To consider : smoking, recent infection, COPD, and cardiac disease ICSI Selected patients with signs or symptoms suggesting new or unstable cardiopulmonary disease INAHTA Chest X-ray abnormality correspond more closely with ASA status than with age (McCleane) i The results of between 0% and 2.1% of chest X-rays leads to a change in management There is no published evidence that routine preoperative chest X-rays decrease perioperative risks ii . NICE Minor surgery: ASA I : not indicated ASA II : consider > 40 y if respiratory or CV disease ASA III : consider if respiratory or CV disease Intermediate surgery: ASA I : not indicated ASA II : consider if respiratory or CV disease (renal > 60y) ASA III : consider if respiratory, CV or renal disease Major surgery: ASA I : consider > 60 ASA II : consider if respiratory, CV or renal disease ASA III : consider if respiratory, CV or renal disease
Source Statement ACA Not included ACP Not included ASA Selected patients : Agreement : 90 % of consultants, 92 % ASA Members To consider : smoking, recent infection, COPD, and cardiac disease ICSI Selected patients with signs or symptoms suggesting new or unstable cardiopulmonary disease INAHTA Chest X-ray abnormality correspond more closely with ASA status than with age (McCleane) i The results of between 0% and 2.1% of chest X-rays leads to a change in management There is no published evidence that routine preoperative chest X-rays decrease

Only 26% would choose to inform the patient outside the existing organs, and with a stronger preference on informing after the decision is taken. In the first scenario, there is no significant difference between the respondents with regard to the choice of the place where the information is given (inside or outside the existing decision-making organs) according their current/past membership (or not) of the INAMI – RIZIV organs.
In the first scenario, there is no significant difference between the respondents with regard to the choice of the place where the information is given (inside or outside the existing decision-making organs) according their current/past membership (or not) of the INAMI – RIZIV organs.