Or, la Cour EDH a pu préciser à plusieurs reprises et notamment dans l'arrêt Hristovi c. Bulgarie du 11 octobre 2011 que: « Where the cir
cumstances are such that the authorities are obliged to deploy masked officers to effect a
n arrest, the Court considers that the latter should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification — for example a number or letter, thus allowing for their
identification and questioning in the event of cha ...[+++]llenges to the manner in which the operation was conducted » (§ 92).Welnu, het EHRM heeft meer dan eens en onder andere in het arrest Hristovi tegen Bulgarije van 11 oktober 2011 onderstreept : « Where the cir
cumstances are such that the authorities are obliged to deploy masked officers to effect a
n arrest, the Court considers that the latter should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification — for example a number or letter, thus allowing for their
identification and questioning in the event of cha ...[+++]llenges to the manner in which the operation was conducted » (§ 92).