Mr. Mark Winfield: The regime that would be proposed here, in fact both on pollution prevention and emergency planning, even with the amendments we're proposing, would be extremely modest compared to, for example, pollution prevention planning in Massachusetts, where they deal with 500 substances, or the emergency planning requirements that exist in the United States under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, Super Fund Act Amendments, the Reauthorization Act of 1986, and the Clean Air Act.
M. Mark Winfield: Même avec les amendements que nous proposons, sur le plan de la prévention de la pollution et de la planification d'urgence, ce régime serait extrêmement modeste comparé, par exemple, aux plans de prévention de la pollution du Massachussets qui portent sur 500 substances, ou encore comparé aux plans d'urgence qui ex
iste aux États-Unis dans le cadre de la Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, des Super Fund Act Amendments, du Reauthorization Act
...[+++] of 1986, et du Clean Air Act.