I think we're splitting hairs to try to find ways that the minister can't answer questions that he is perfectly capable of answering. If he says he didn't see it necessary, he can say that, but I think it's artificial to suggest that something that's mentioned in terms of capital expenditures is okay, but asking why something is not in it is not.
Je sais que la députée aimerait parler de crédits qui n'y figurent pas, mais s'ils n'y figurent pas, c'est parce qu'ils ont été financés à l'interne, à même le budget du ministère.