Vertaling van "nova to recuse " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

application for recusal | recusal application | recusal request
demande de récusation

challenge [ challenge to a judge | challenge to a juror | challenge to a lay magistrate | challenge to an arbitrator | challenge to a referee | challenge to a witness | challenge to evidence | challenge to jurors | challenge to testimony | jury challenge | recusal of a judge | recusation of a judge ]
récusation [ récusation d'arbitre | récusation d'un juge | récusation d'un magistrat non professionnel | récusation d'un témoignage | récusation d'un témoin | récusation de jurés ]

Nova Scotia Fisheries and Aquaculture Loan Board [ Fisheries and Aquaculture Loan Board | Nova Scotia Fisheries Loan Board | Nova Scotia Resources Development Board | Fishermen's Loan Board of Nova Scotia ]
Conseil des prêts pour la pêche et l'aquaculture [ Nova Scotia Fisheries Loan Board ]

Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act [ Canada-Nova Scotia Oil and Gas Agreement (Nova Scotia) Act ]
Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act [ Canada-Nova Scotia Oil and Gas Agreement (Nova Scotia) Act ]

Building Owners & Managers Association Nova Scotia [ BOMA Nova Scotia | BOMA Nova Scotia ]
Building Owners & Managers Association Nova Scotia [ BOMA Nova Scotia | BOMA Nova Scotia ]

Nocardia nova
Nocardia nova

Nova Scotia
Nouvelle-Écosse

recusal
récusation

ground for recusal
motif de récusation | cause de récusation

Nova Scotia
Nouvelle Ecosse | Nouvelle-Écosse

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

Subsequently, Mr. Mulroney filed a lawsuit against the member for West Nova. Once that had been done, another member of the ethics committee, the Conservative member for Dufferin—Caledon, in a point of order, asked the member for West Nova to recuse himself because the member for Dufferin—Caledon stated that there was a private interest involved, and since the member for West Nova was being sued by Mr. Mulroney, the member for West Nova should not have the ability to question Mr. Mulroney, should not have the ability nor should he be a part of the committee that is conducting the investigations because it would be a conflict of interest.
Cela fait, un autre membre du Comité de l’éthique, le député conservateur de Dufferin—Caledon, a invoqué le Règlement et demandé au député de Nova-Ouest de se récuser parce que, affirmait-il, il y avait un intérêt personnel en cause.

The point of order, Mr. Chairman, is that I believe [the member for West Nova] should recuse himself from this committee.
J’invoque le Règlement, monsieur le président, parce que je pense que [le député de Nova-Ouest] devrait se récuser.

Given this interest, the member for West Nova should recuse himself and no longer participate in parliamentary business pertaining to the Mulroney-Schreiber affair.
Compte tenu de cet intérêt, le député de Nova-Ouest doit se récuser et ne plus participer aux travaux parlementaires sur l'affaire Mulroney-Schreiber.

The Ethics Commissioner did a quick investigation and came back with a report stating that, as the member for Dufferin—Caledon suggested, the member for West Nova should recuse himself, should not be able to participate in the hearings, and should not have been able to question or cross-examine Mr. Mulroney because there was a clear conflict of interest.
Le député de Dufferin—Caledon a donc écrit une lettre de plainte à la commissaire à l’éthique, lui demandant d’intervenir, de donner son interprétation et de rendre une décision: le député de Nova-Ouest devait-il, oui ou non, se récuser?

By the code's definition, she found, a lawsuit filed by Brian Mulroney over comments [the member for West Nova] made in a television interview represented a “private interest” that should have led the MP to recuse himself from committee hearings into the Mulroney-Schreiber affair.
Selon la définition du code, elle a conclu qu'une poursuite déposée par Brian Mulroney concernant les commentaires [du député de Nova-Ouest] lors d'une entrevue télévisée représentait des « intérêts personnels » qui auraient dû inciter le député à se récuser des audiences du comité concernant l'affaire Mulroney-Schreiber.