On March 19, 2013, as the debate resumed on the motion, as amended, of Senator Cools, seconded by Senator Comeau, concerning the question of privilege relating to the actions of the former Parliamentary Budget Officer, clarification was sought by Senator Cools as to whether or not there were now two questions rather one question before the house.
Le 19 mars 2013, à la reprise du débat sur la motion, telle que modifiée, de la sénatrice Cools, appuyée par le sénateur Comeau, concernant la question de privilège sur les actions de l'ancien directeur parlementaire du budget, la sénatrice Cools s'est interrogée à savoir si le Sénat était saisi non plus d'une, mais de deux questions.