The bill also states, in paragraph 2 of section 4.1, that the applicant has the onus of satisfying the Board that the pardon would provide a measurable benefit to the applicant and would sustain his or her rehabilitation in society as a law-abiding citizen, but it does not talk about bringing the administration of justice into disrepute.
Également, au deuxième paragraphe de l’article 4,1, on dit que le demandeur a le fardeau de convaincre la commission que la réhabilitation lui apporterait un bénéfice mesurable et soutiendrait sa réadaptation en tant que citoyen respectueux des lois, mais il ne traite pas du critère de déconsidérer l'administration de la justice.