Vertaling van "types framework " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

box-type support | mounting framework | support chassis | supporting framework
caisson-support

Framework Programme for Research and Development [ Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development | Framework Programme on Research and Development | FRDP | R&TD Framework Programme | RDFP | Research and Development Framework Programme | RTD Framework Programme ]
programme-cadre de recherche et développement [ PCRD | PCRDT | programme-cadre de RDT | programme-cadre de recherche | programme-cadre de recherche et développement technologique ]

On gold standards palliative care framework
on gold standards palliative care framework

construct framework sections | fabricate framework sections | build framework sections | manufacture framework sections
fabriquer des sections de cadres

Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism | Framework Decision on combating terrorism | Framework Decision on Terrorism
décision-cadre relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme | décision-cadre sur le terrorisme

Framework Agreement | framework agreement for cooperation | Framework Agreement for Trade and Cooperation
accord-cadre de coopération

financial supervision [ ESFS | European Supervisory Framework | European System of Financial Supervision | EU Supervisory Framework | financial market supervision | financial surveillance | prudential control | prudential supervision | supervision of financial institutions ]
surveillance financière [ cadre de surveillance de l'UE | cadre européen de surveillance | contrôle prudentiel | SESF | supervision financière | surveillance des établissements financiers | surveillance prudentielle | système européen de surveillance financière ]

Kyoto Protocol [ Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ]
Protocole de Kyoto [ Protocole de Kyoto à la Convention-cadre des Nations unies sur les changements climatiques ]

A group of tyrosine related oculocutaneous albinism (OCA1) that includes OCA1A, OCA1B, type 1 minimal pigment oculocutaneous albinism (OCA1-MP) and type 1 temperature sensitive oculocutaneous albinism (OCA1-TS). The phenotypic spectrum seen in OCA1 i
albinisme oculo-cutané type 1

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 4B2 (CMT4B2) is a severe early-onset demyelinating CMT peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Clinically and pathologically very similar to Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4B1 with childhood-onset of muscle weakness, senso
maladie de Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4B2

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

This Regulation is a new separate regulation in the context of the Community type-approval procedure under Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) .
Le présent règlement est un nouveau règlement distinct dans le contexte de la procédure de réception communautaire au titre de la directive 2007/46/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 5 septembre 2007 établissant un cadre pour la réception des véhicules à moteur, de leurs remorques et des systèmes, des composants et des entités techniques destinés à ces véhicules (directive-cadre) .

(1) A comprehensive Union type-approval system for motor vehicles has been established by Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 on establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive)[5].
(1) Un système de réception par type des véhicules à moteur à l’échelle de l’Union a été mis en place par la directive 2007/46/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 5 septembre 2007 établissant un cadre pour la réception des véhicules à moteur, de leurs remorques et des systèmes, des composants et des entités techniques destinés à ces véhicules (directive-cadre)[5].

We said that we would invest in areas which would generate economic growth and increase our productivity as a country, understanding full well that in order to compete in an international economy we need to have the type of regulatory framework which speaks to the decisions which will generate wealth in order to generate the revenues which will result in the type of social programs to which Canadians have grown accustomed.
Nous avons promis d'investir dans des domaines qui favoriseraient l'essor économique et augmenteraient la productivité de notre pays, en étant très conscients du fait que, pour soutenir la concurrence sur le marché international, il nous faut un cadre réglementaire conforme aux décisions favorisant la création de richesse qui, à leur tour, produiront des recettes qui subventionneront les programmes sociaux auxquels les Canadiens se sont habitués.

One of the original efforts, through something called the federal-provincial-territorial agrifood inspection committee, was to come up with a national framework such that, if a provincial government became involved in the HACCP overview process at the farm level or in the non-registered sector, we were using a common framework to do that type of an assessment.
L'un de nos premiers projets, qui a été réalisé, est ce que l'on appelait le Comité d'inspection agroalimentaire fédérale-provinciale-territoriale, qui visait à mettre en place un cadre national de façon à ce qu'un gouvernement provincial puisse évaluer un système HACCP dans une exploitation agricole ou dans le secteur non régi à partir d'un cadre commun.

(Return tabled) Question No. 152 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the development of unconventional gas resources, including shale, tight and coal bed methane, and its possible impacts on the environment: (a) what, if any, research has the government undertaken regarding the development of unconventional gas resources, (i) what was the scope of this research in the areas of, but not limited to, air quality, aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem impacts, economic impacts, occupational risks, public safety concerns, and seismic risks, (ii) what, if any, resources did the government provide for this research, (iii) what, if any, process was established to ensure the independence of the researchers, their research, and their findings, (iv) what, if any, case studies were considered as a part of this research, (v) what, if any, scenarios regarding the development of unconventional gas resources were developed as frameworks for the research, (vi) what economic, environmental and social impacts were identified by this research, (vii) what, if any, priority research areas were identified for further study as a result of this research, (viii) what, if any, departments were involved in this research, (ix) what, if any, action was undertaken to ensure inter-departmental cooperation throughout the research process, (x) what, if any, gaps or weaknesses in the regulatory framework did the research identify; (b) what, if any, research has the government undertaken regarding balancing shale gas' potential contribution to energy security with environmental risks; (c) what are the sources of greenhouse gas emissions associated with unconventional gas; (d) has the government developed a process to determine the overall carbon footprint of shale gas throughout the life cycle of natural gas use, if not, why not, and, if so, (i) what federal departments are involved in this process, (ii) how does the government ensure inter-departmental collaboration on this process, (iii) what is the p ...
(Le document est déposé) Question n 152 Mme Kirsty Duncan: En ce qui concerne le développement des ressources gazières non classiques, y compris le gaz de schiste, le gaz de formation imperméable et le méthane de houille, et l’impact possible sur l’environnement: a) le cas échéant, quelles recherches le gouvernement a-t-il entreprises au sujet du développement des ressources gazières non classiques, (i) quelle était la portée de ces recherches pour ce qui est, par exemple, de la qualité de l’air, de l’impact sur les écosystèmes aquatiques et terrestres, des impacts économiques, des risques professionnels, de la sécurité publique et des risques séismiques, (ii) le cas échéant, quelles ressources le gouvernement a-t-il prévues pour ces recherches, (iii) le cas échéant, quel processus a été établi pour protéger l’indépendance des chercheurs, de leurs travaux et de leurs conclusions, (iv) le cas échéant, quelles études de cas a-t-on examinées dans le cadre de ces recherches, (v) le cas échéant, quels scénarios a-t-on préparés pour le développement des ressources gazières non classiques comme cadres pour ces recherches, (vi) quels impacts économiques, environnementaux et sociaux ont été identifiés dans ces recherches, (vii) le cas échéant, quels sont les domaines prioritaires de recherche pour une étude plus approfondie à la suite de ces recherches, (viii) le cas échéant, quels ministères ont participé à ces recherches, (ix) le cas échéant, quelle mesure a été entreprise pour garantir une coopération interministérielle tout au long du processus de recherche; (x) le cas échéant, quelles lacunes ou faiblesses du cadre réglementaire les travaux de recherche ont-ils permis d’identifier; b) le cas échéant, quelles recherches le gouvernement a-t-il entreprises pour établir un équilibre entre la contribution possible du gaz de formation imperméable au secteur de l’énergie et les risques pour l’environnement; c) quelles sont les sources d’émissions de gaz à effet de serre ass ...

Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council already establishes a framework for the type approval of motor vehicles and their parts or related equipment, and Directive 2002/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down rules on the type approval of two or three-wheel motor vehicles, and agricultural or forestry tractors and their parts or related equipment.
La directive 2007/46/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil établit déjà un cadre pour la réception des véhicules à moteur et de leurs pièces détachées ou de leur matériel connexe, et la directive 2002/24/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil ainsi que la directive 2003/37/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil établissent des règles concernant la réception par type des véhicules à moteur à deux ou trois roues et des tracteurs agricoles ou forestiers et de leurs pièces détachées ou de leur matériel connexe.

To that end, a comprehensive Community type-approval system for motor vehicles, established by Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) , is in place.
À cette fin, un système de réception communautaire global pour les véhicules à moteur, établi par la directive 2007/46/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 5 septembre 2007 relative à la réception des véhicules à moteur, de leurs remorques et des systèmes, composants et entités techniques destinés à ces véhicules («directive cadre») , est en place.

This Regulation is one of the separate regulatory acts in the context of the Community type-approval procedure under Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) .
Le présent règlement est un des actes réglementaires particuliers relatifs à la procédure de réception communautaire par type adoptés en vertu de la directive 2007/46/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 5 septembre 2007 établissant un cadre pour la réception des véhicules à moteur, de leurs remorques et des systèmes, des composants et des entités techniques distinctes destinés à ces véhicules (directive-cadre) .

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...

Mr. Thorlakson: Again, I would say that in relation to derivatives, there's more of an explicit focus on derivatives as being a type of transaction, but that is not to say that that didn't occur previously, that the types of risks that were present in derivatives have always been managed and subject to regulatory oversight and to an institution's own governance framework.
M. Thorlakson : On met beaucoup plus l'accent sur les produits dérivés, qu'on considère maintenant comme des transactions, mais cela ne veut pas dire que cela n'a jamais été le cas auparavant. Les types de risque qui accompagnent les instruments dérivés ont toujours été gérés et assujettis à une surveillance réglementaire ainsi qu'au cadre de gouvernance propre de l'institution.