Mr. Toews raised three issues of privilege: one, the use of House resources for the so-called Vikileaks30 account on Twitter, which he claimed was used to attack him personally, thereby degrading his reputation and obstructing him from carrying out his duties as a member of Parliament; two, an apparent campaign to inundate his office with calls, emails, and faxes, which he contended hindered him and his staff from serving his constituents and preventing constituents with legitimate needs from contacting their member of Parliament in a timely fashion; three, the v
ideos posted on the website YouTube by the so-called Anonymous on February
...[+++] 18, 22, and 25.
M. Toews a soulevé trois questions de privilège: la première concerne l'utilisation des ressources de la Chambre pour le compte Twitter vikileaks30, qui aurait servi, selon ses dires, à l'attaquer personnellement, ternissant ainsi sa réputation et faisant obstruction à l'exercice de ses fonctions de député. La deuxième concerne une apparente campagne visant à inonder son bureau d'appels, de courriels et de fax qui, selon lui, l'a empêché, ainsi que son personnel, de servir ses électeurs et a fait en sorte que des électeurs ayant des besoins légitimes n'ont pas pu le joindre en temps opportun.
