Traduction de «hypnosis is compared with other interventions » (Français → Néerlandais) :

When hypnosis is compared with other interventions
When hypnosis is compared with other interventions involving therapist contact, group contact or other support there is no evidence that it is more successful.

JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
JAMA 2002 ; 288 :2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstlineantihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT).JAMA 2002; 288: 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstline antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

Prévention secondaire: L’étude " Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID)" est un essai multicentrique, randomisé, en double aveugle, contrôlé contre placebo, comparant l'effet de la pravastatine (40 mg/jour) à celui d’un placebo chez 9.014 patients âgés de 31 à 75 ans pendant une durée moyenne de 5,6 années et présentant un taux de cholestérol sérique normal ou élevé (cholestérol total initial = 155 à 271 mg/dl [4.0-7.0 mmol/l], cholestérol total moyen = 219 mg/dl [5,66 mmol/l]) ainsi que des taux variables de triglycérides allant jusqu'à 443 mg/dl [5,0 mmol/l] et un antécédent d'infarctus du myocarde ou d'angor instable dans les 3 à 36 mois précédents.
Secundaire preventie: De “Long Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID)” studie was een multicenter, gerandomiseerde, dubbelblinde, placebogecontroleerde studie waarbij de effecten van pravastatine (40 mg eenmaal daags) met die van placebo werden vergeleken bij 9014 patiënten in de leeftijd van 31 tot 75 jaar, gedurende gemiddeld 5,6 jaar, met normale tot verhoogde serum cholesterolwaarden (uitgangswaarden voor totaal cholesterol van 155 tot 271 mg/dl [4,0 – 7,0 mmol/l], gemiddeld totaal cholesterol is 219 mg/dl [5,66 mmol/l]) en met variabele triglyceridenwaarden tot 443 mg/dl [5,0 mmol/l]. In de voorafgaande 3-36 maanden hadden zij een myocardinfarct of instabiele angina pectoris.

L’étude " Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID)" est un essai multicentrique, randomisé, en double aveugle, contrôlé contre placebo, comparant l'effet de la pravastatine (40 mg/jour) à celui d'un placebo chez 9.014 patients âgés de 31 à 75 ans pendant une durée moyenne de 5,6 années et présentant un taux de cholestérol sérique normal ou élevé (cholestérol total initial = 155 à 271 mg/dl [4,0 - 7,0 mmol/l], cholestérol total moyen = 219 mg/dl [5,66 mmol/l]) ainsi que des taux variables de triglycérides allant jusqu’à 443 mg/dl [5,0 mmol/l] et un antécédent d’infarctus du myocarde ou d’angor instable dans les 3 à 36 mois précédents.
De studie “Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID)” is een multicenter, gerandomiseerd, dubbelblind, placebogecontroleerd onderzoek waarin het effect van pravastatine (40 mg/dag) wordt vergeleken met dat van een placebo bij 9.014 patiënten van 31 tot 75 jaar oud, gedurende gemiddeld 5,6 jaar en met een normaal of verhoogd cholesterolgehalte in het serum (initiële totale cholesterol = 155 tot 271 mg/dl [4,0 - 7,0 mmol/l], gemiddelde totale cholesterol = 219 mg/dl [5,66 mmol/l]) evenals variabele gehalten van triglyceriden gaande tot 443 mg/dl [5,0 mmol/l] en een antecedent van een myocardinfarct of van instabiele angor in de 3 tot 36 voorgaande maanden.

For families at risk, provide home-based educational interventions to help proactively to improve parenting skills, health behaviour and interaction between parents and children. vii. Set up in partnership with other ministers evidence-based education programmes addressing suicide, depression, alcohol and other substance use disorders for young people at schools and universities and involve role models and young people in the making of campaigns. viii.
Set up in partnership with other ministers evidence-based education programmes addressing suicide, depression, alcohol and other substance use disorders for young people at schools and universities and involve role models and young people in the making of campaigns. viii.

The evidence table shows that only one RCT, the SAPPHIRE trial, has been finalised and published. 28 The other two ongoing trials describe safety profiles of the competing interventions, with the EVA-3S trial alerting clinicians for the better outcomes with PCAS over unprotected stenting.
The evidence table shows that only one RCT, the SAPPHIRE trial, has been finalised and published.28 The other two ongoing trials describe safety profiles of the competing interventions, with the EVA-3S trial alerting clinicians for the better outcomes with PCAS over unprotected stenting.

transparency in ambulatory supplements as well as in private hospital illustrated that in Belgian hospitals nurses have, on average, to take care insurances (the percentage of people with private hospital insurance, and for more patients compared to other EU countries.
mechanisms, individual private insurances reimburse several healthcare Macro-level data on the needs should be complemented with dataa that services.

The graphs „Medical treatment‰ and „trial centres‰ show the results of the ACST/ACAS trials (expressed as constant hazards of stroke or death from the trials and age dependent hazards of all other cause mortality from the Flemish male life table at age 70 in the year 2000). 18 Intervention starts with a short period of high (peri-procedural) mortality, but the lower post-procedural hazard of death will overtake the higher hazard of medical treatment.
The graphs „Medical treatment‰ and „trial centres‰ show the results of the ACST/ACAS trials (expressed as constant hazards of stroke or death from the trials and age dependent hazards of all other cause mortality from the Flemish male life table at age 70 in the year 2000).[18] Intervention starts with a short period of high (peri-procedural) mortality, but the lower post-procedural hazard of death will overtake the higher hazard of medical treatment.