Vertaling van "update screening mammography among women aged " (Frans → Nederlands) :

13. Ringash J. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
12. Ringash J. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

55. Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness.
56. Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness.

screening round). Conversely, false-negative mammography results are a little more common among women aged 70 to 79 years (1.5 per 1000 women per screening round).
Rates of additional imaging are relatively low among women aged 70 to 79 years (64.03 per 1000 women per screening round).

Biopsy rates are higher among women aged 70 to 79 years (12.2 per 1000 women per screening round) than among younger women. As expected, the number of screen detectedd cancer is highest in this age group.
As expected, the number of screen detectedd cancer is highest in this age group.

18. Larsson LG, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, Tabar L, et al. Updated overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization.
18. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nystrom L, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.

Additional diagnostic tests Rates of additional imaging are relatively low among women aged 70 to 79 years (64.03 per 1000 women per screening round).
Biopsy rates are higher among women aged 70 to 79 years (12.2 per 1000 women per screening round) than among younger women.

Table 10: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)
Table 8: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)