So while I can't give you a quantitative answer to your first question, I'm sure the situation would be vastly improved by 20% dedicated funding, but it would be a bigger challenge six years later. And, as I say, the issue of a dollar spent now is probably more critical than it was six or seven years ago.
Donc, même si je ne peux pas vous donner une réponse quantitative à votre première question, je suis certain que la situation serait nettement meilleure si l'on consacrait 20 p. 100 des revenus, mais la difficulté serait encore plus grande six ans plus tard.