I would suggest that when people have motions, they might test them out on the clerk to see if they're within the rules. Maybe then they could test their motions out with a researcher, supposing those motions are of a scientific nature, to see that they actually are feasible or that there is some scientific basis for them, before taking up the committee's time with motions that we, as lay people, are inclined to think would be a good thing.
Ensuite, ils peuvent aussi les soumettre à un attaché de recherche s'il s'agit de motions de nature scientifique pour vérifier leur bien-fondé au plan scientifique, avant d'accaparer le temps du comité avec des motions que nous avons tendance à juger acceptables, car nous sommes profanes en la matière.