Given the admission that the Prime Minister's senior policy advisor, Eddie Goldenberg, was kept up-to-date on the matter affecting the Prime Minister's son-in-law, will the Minister of Industry admit that he and the Minister of Canadian Heritage were players in the Prime Minister's charade, in which he used his senior policy advisor to achieve indirectly what the law prohibits him from doing directly?
Or, puisque le conseiller principal du premier ministre, Eddie Goldenberg, a été constamment tenu au courant du dossier du gendre du premier ministre, est-ce que le ministre de l'Industrie reconnaît avoir participé, avec le ministre du Patrimoine, à la mascarade qui permettait au premier ministre de se servir de son conseiller principal pour faire indirectement ce que la loi lui interdit directement?