Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: And yet, if I look at your amendment to Sub-section 96(1) you say : “In determining for the purpose of Section 92, whether or not a merger or a proposed merger.“, and then in Sub-clause 1(5), you say : “This section does not apply where, after the transaction has been completed, the merger.“ So, that means that an assessment has to be made after the merger transaction has been completed.
M. Stéphane Bergeron: Mais pourtant, si je prends le paragraphe 96(1) que vous nous proposez en amendement, vous dites: «Pour déterminer, aux fins de l'article 92, si un fusionnement réalisé ou proposé..».