Going to a two-year appropriation would certainly reduce the frequency with which we have these discussions about a lapse, but it wouldn't utterly eliminate the discussions, and the reason it wouldn't is that things would still go sideways.
Si on adoptait un cycle de deux ans, cela réduirait certainement la fréquence des discussions que nous avons sur les fonds inutilisés, mais cela ne supprimerait pas les discussions, parce que cela n'empêcherait pas les dérapages.