Finally, as regards the effects of the conduct at issue, the Court of Justice, in common with the General Court, takes the view that, in order to be regarded as abusive, a margin squeeze must have made market penetration more difficult for Deutsche Telekom’s competitors.
Enfin, quant aux effets du comportement en cause, la Cour, comme le Tribunal, estime que, pour être considérée comme abusive, une pratique de compression des marges doit avoir rendu l’accès des concurrents de Deutsche Telekom au marché concerné plus difficile.