I guess my question is: Could you think of an example — and I think Senator Runciman touched on this a bit — where you feel if a person of complete sane mind, fully sober, 25 years old, not a juvenile, intentionally goes and desecrates a war monument, shows a complete and total lack of respect, can you tell me what you would think would be a fair penalty — and I know you would simply say " mandatory minimums are not good" .
Voici ma question : pouvez-vous me donner un exemple — et je pense que le sénateur Runciman en a parlé un peu — où une personne qui vous semblerait totalement saine d'esprit, sobre, de 25 ans (pas une personne mineure) irait intentionnellement profaner un monument de guerre, afficher un total manque de respect?