What's more fruitful, perhaps, and more appropriate is for committees to defend themselves against false testimony and for committees to call upon witnesses to explain their testimony, and for committees, acting perhaps as judge and jury, to form a conclusion as to whether they were or were not misled or lied to by a witness, and to make a recommendation to the House that action be taken and so on, and to go that route, for which you don't need an oath, in my view.
Ce qui serait plus efficace et plus approprié, je crois, serait que les comités se défendent contre les faux témoignages, qu’ils somment les témoins d’expliquer leur témoignage et que les comités, agissant peut-être comme juge et jury, se forment une opinion à savoir si un témoin les a trompés et qu’ils fassent des recommandations à la Chambre quant aux mesures à prendre, et ainsi de suite, et aller dans cette direction qui ne nécessite pas selon moi d'assermentations.