I'm not sure I actually concur with him on this point, but they could be dealt with via an amendment. For example, if you think that the level of precision that's required is such that the bill becomes onerous, then the logical thing to do is to say, let's pick a larger number we deal with, in the same way that governments have to disclose their grants and contributions down to $10,000, but not below that because we understand that it would be onerous to go beyond that.
Par exemple, si l'on pense que le niveau de précision nécessaire est tel qu'il alourdit le projet de loi, il serait logique de choisir un plus grand nombre, tout comme les gouvernements doivent divulguer leurs subventions et leurs contributions de 10 000 $ et plus, mais pas celles dont les montants sont plus bas, car nous comprenons que ce serait lourd.