That is the second argument, for the Commission had in fact, in the previous year, already decided that no more proposals would be put forward without a broad-based and methodologically sound means of assessing their impact, and it was with this, too, in mind that the proposals were reviewed to determine whether they would be equal to the demands for quality lawmaking that we had newly devised.
C’est là le deuxième argument, car la Commission avait en réalité déjà décidé, l’année dernière, que plus aucune proposition ne serait avancée en l’absence d’un mécanisme large et méthodologiquement solide pou évaluer son impact.