I think there's another reasons to do that too, and it's that the language of the prohibition legislation could inadverently prohibit something it didn't mean to, or it could leave out something that then becomes possible. I think the proposed legislation you have in front of you is much better and more balanced than Bill C-47 was, because it addresses not just prohibitions but the other side of the coin, ensuring access to safe and beneficial technology use.
L'avant-projet de loi dont vous êtes saisis me semble plus équilibré et mieux élaboré que l'ancien projet de loi C-47, car il traite non seulement des interdictions, mais aussi de l'envers de la médaille, c'est-à-dire qu'il assure l'accès à des techniques éprouvées et bénéfiques.