The member understands better than most members of the House the evils of apartheid in South Africa. How could he possibly compare that to the ratification of this Nisga'a treaty, which is supported overwhelmingly by the Nisga'a people and the Nisga'a leadership, which will lead to a sense of pride and self-respect? How could he so degrade and pervert history as to suggest that this has anything to do with apartheid whatsoever?
Comment ce député, qui comprend mieux que quiconque les atrocités de l'apartheid en Afrique du Sud, peut-il travestir l'histoire au point d'établir un rapport entre l'apartheid et la ratification de l'Accord nisga'a, qu'appuie la grande majorité des Nisga'as et des leaders nisga'as et qui engendrera chez eux fierté et dignité?