Justice Murray of the Ontario Court of Justice said that obtaining an accused core biological information — date of birth — amounted to unreasonable search and that the accused had subjective expectation of privacy and information. In 2007, J. Jones of the Ontario Court of Justice said at paragraph 50 that the evidence obtained was in violation of section 8 and section 9 of the Charter because the officer had obtained the person's date of birth.
En 2007, le juge Jones de la Cour de justice de l'Ontario a déclaré au paragraphe 50 que la preuve avait été obtenue en infraction des articles 8 et 9 de la Charte car l'agent avait obtenu la date de naissance de la personne.